In the interest of public education on the functioning of state legislatures, this paper presents information on the rules governing state legislatures — using Arizona as a representative example — that affect passing bills into law. I focus on the Rules committee’s powers to obstruct the voice of the people, and how it can prevent — kill — HOA reform bills by the actions of the political party leaders.
The powers of the Rules committee are undemocratic and authoritarian in nature designed to thwart, apparently, the folly of the voice of the people. We see the same undemocratic, authoritarian powers granted to HOA boards to an even greater extent, The national lobbying group’s promotion of the “business judgment rule,” and acceptance by the courts, is a prime example.
Exhibit 1 details the Rules powers that can prevent HOA reform bills, and any other bill not liked by the powers that be, from a hearing and vote by the full chamber — by the people’s representatives. As I wrote earlier, Arizona’s HB 2052, a bill that has in reality been killed in the Rules committee after unanimous approval by the House and Senate government committees, is a prime example of this misuse of authority.
The Senate Fact Sheet “intro” paragraph misrepresents the content of the bill:
“Expands statutory restrictions on condominium unit owners’ association and planned community association (HOA) regulation of political signs to include signs related to certain community activity. Prohibits an HOA from prohibiting door-to-door community activity”.
Of the 8 listed “Provisions,” 2 are technical, 2 relate to political signs, and 4 — given a short sentence in the “intro” — expand on HOA restrictions and prohibition’s protecting free political speech and expression, in the HOA public forum, as curtained in my earlier “Senate Protects” posting.
. . . .
The Arizona Legislature, and each and every state legislature, is not a sovereign that can do no wrong, but has duties and obligations sworn to under oath “to establish justice . . . and secure the blessings of liberty” for the people of its state. It cannot demand respect but must earn it through good deeds. Passing HB 2052 into law would be a sign of good faith that would earn the respect of the people.
Exhibit 1. Arizona Legislative Council publications
“In the Senate, bills are usually not “held” in the Rules Committee for partisan or political purposes; bills which go into the Rules Committee are almost always reported out. In the House, the Chairman of the Rules Committee can “hold” (read “kill”) a bill simply by not giving it a hearing. (p. 52).
“The options of the committee chairman are a) Hear the bill and vote on it, b) Hear the bill but take no action, c) Assign the bill to subcommittee, d) Not hear the bill. (p. 39-40).”
“The Role of the Rules Committee,” State Senator Randall Gnant, From Idea to Bill to Law (2000). (As of April 2021).
“Each measure is assigned to the Rules Committee of the house through which it is progressing . . . . The Rules Committees assess the constitutionality of the proposed legislation. Unless they are withdrawn or discharged, all bills must pass the Rules Committee before they are heard on the floor. (p.41-42).
“An Active Calendar of the Committee of the Whole (so called in both houses) consisting of bills the Speaker or President selects for consideration by the respective Committee of the Whole (COW).
“A calendar consisting of all bills and other measures that have been reported from the committees. In the House this is called the “House Calendar.” In the Senate it is called the “Calendar of the Committee of the Whole.” These calendars are simply a list of bills and other measures that are ready for further action by the full chamber.” (p.42-43).
Arizona Legislative Manual 2003 Edition, Arizona Legislative Council (2003). (As of April 2021).
 See court holdings: Calif. holds HOA elections as protected free speech public elections (2019); NV supreme court upholds HOAs as public forums (2021).
 Supra n. 2, AZ Senate Protects.