Disappointingly sad performance by AZ Coalition lobbying for reforms

I was impressed by Arizona Senator Kavanagh’s unsolicited comments at the Jan. 25th meeting on SB 1113[1] that there is evidence of coerced agreement to be bound by the CC&Rs, and his acknowledgement that there are arguments questioning the consent to be bound to that effect.  He must be reading my posts on this issue,[2] or being informed of them.  However, I am disappointed by his, and Senator D. Farnsworth’s, failure to enact remedial legislation; and the failure of that alleged homeowner’s group, Arizona Homeowners Coalition, to also lobby for remedial legislation.

Dennis Legere, representing the Coalition, objected to the bill on the very profound argument that it was insignificant, especially when there were other more important issues. Yet, I didn’t see any support or bill addressing Kavanagh’s coerced agreement statement.  However, he argues for more homeowner involvement in HOA rulemaking, a function of the Rules committees and/or board. Where is the bill for fair elections to the board to remove the existing bars to meaningful participation and make this a reality?[3]  He then makes the untrue statement that HOA rules dominate the CC&Rs and bylaws.  Say what?

Since the Coalition opposed Kavanagh’s sponsored SB 1113 on such grounds, Kavanagh indicated that he  will take another look at his other bills to see if he will support them.  WOW! There are some good bills that need passage, and some bills that the Coalition failed to recommend.  One bill, SB 1240, by Kavanagh, needs to be withdraw as it is facially unconstitutional.[4] But, Leger and his group see no evil. If the group decides to oppose this bill I’m fine with that but I will not speak against this bill [SB 1240] as a representative or an individual.”[5]   A sad performance by Legere, sad indeed.   I’m at a loss to understand Legere’s rationale.

I hope Senators Kavanagh and Farnsworth rise to level of supporting justice for homeowners and recognize that these fundamental ills of a defective HOA legal scheme, as I summarized in HOA Common Sense: rejecting private government,[6] need to be addressed and corrected.



[1] See video.

[2] See HOA Common Sense: rejecting private government, Consent to be governed, No. 4.

[3] See Democratic elections, No. 5.

[4] See Another AZ HOA bill constitutionality challenge looms: SB 1240.

[5] Jan. 27, 2017 email to the Coalition members.

[6] See Amazon webpage, http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00GL6J7BU


Published by


"The Voice for HOA Constitutionality". I have been a long-term homeowner rights authority, advocate and author of "The HOA-Land Nation Within America" (2019) and" Establishing the New America of independent HOA principalities" (2008). See HOA Constitutional Government at http://pvtgov.org. My efforts with HOAs took me to a broader concern that was deeply affecting the constituionality of HOAs. Those broad societal and plotical concerns caused me to start this new blog for my commentaries on the State of the New America.

One thought on “Disappointingly sad performance by AZ Coalition lobbying for reforms”

  1. Why would anyone interested in homeowner property rights oppose SB 1113? Especially in Arizona, where the climate does not support growing a lush green lawn. Yes, there are more important issues, but any issue that promotes private property rights is a step in the right direction for homeowners and residents in HOAs.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.