“Have you even read the US Constitution?” was a question asked of Donald Trump by Mr. Khizr Khan, a Muslim, at the Democratic National Convention this past Thursday. The implication was that Trump’s actions and views were contrary and inconsistent with the terms and conditions of the US Constitution.
In HOA-Land, under its organic ‘law,’ the 1964 Homes Association Handbook, the US Constitution is ignored and has no applicability to HOAs. State laws and HOA declarations are permitted to be held valid by the courts as HOAs are seen to be voluntary private agreements that contain unknowing waivers and surrenders of fundamental rights and freedoms by its members. Understanding this reality, I can ask in regard the applicability of the US Constitution to HOA-Land, “Why bother?”
In the same context of contrary and inconsistent acts and views, the same question can be asked of legislators in every state, state agencies whose function is to protect consumers, the legal-academic elitists who act as if they are the modern incarnation of Philosopher-Kings, and the media that, by its silence, aids and abets a false and misleading picture of HOA-Land.
The people are being intentionally deceived. Which candidate, if any, will stand up for those 23% Americans living under HOA-Land private governments not subject to the Constitution?
 The question was asked of Donald Trump in regard to Trump’s views and positions on Muslim immigration. Mr. Khan’s son, a US Army Captain, was killed in Iraq.
 “The U.S. Code defines the organic laws of the United States to include the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation, the Northwest Ordinance, and the U.S. Constitution. (US Statutes At Large, 1789 –1875, Vol. 18, Part I, Revised Statutes (43rd Congress, 1st session), p. v and vi). The organic laws of HOA-Land are replacing the organic laws of the US as applied to local government.” See Legislative protection of HOAs: replacing US organic law with HOA organic law.