AZ class action against HOA management firms for unauthorized practice of law

A class action suit was filed in Maricopa County, AZ against numerous HOA management firms for the unauthorized practice of law resulting from their attempts to collect HOA debts.  The two plaintiffs allege against some 30 management firms, among other things,

Upon information and belief, the Defendants represented to the public and to members of the Class that they were acting with the full measure of authority reserved for licensed legal counsel for Defendants by negotiating debt on behalf of a third party, drafting, filing and/or preparing legal papers, including liens, debt collection letters, complaints, default judgment, judgments, and other debt collections activities which require the appearance of a licensed and authorized attorney; and charging fees for the foregoing activities. . . . Defendants actions directed at these Class Members constitute the unauthorized practice of law and are clear violations of the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act and Arizona law.

 

Crame v. 360 Management (Maricopa County Superior Court, CV 2012-095288, Sept. 10, 2012). The case has been moved to Federal Court.

A class action is undertaken when the number of victims is so numerous and who have basically the same allegations of wrongdoing. The two plaintiffs represent the class of homeowners who meet the following criteria,

 

All persons or entities who, at any time from August 1, 2006 to the present (the “Class Period”), were members of a Homeowners’ Association or like entity and who were pursued for an alleged debt owed to that Homeowners’ Association or like entity by any of the Defendants or other Community Management Companies who purported to pursue collections against said persons or entities without proper legal representation and/or on behalf of their third party HOA/Condo customers and/or who improperly held themselves out to be an attorney.

  

Related information

Class Action Filed Against AZ HOA Management Companies (Attorney Roger Wood blog)

UPL 12-01 – Scope of Legal Services to HOA’s (March 2012) (State Bar Advisory Opinion)

Final Order: HOA management firm engaged in unauthorized practice of law (AAM, LLC  was the defendant.  Still not made public info on the Supreme Court or State Bar web pages.)

 

PLEASE pass this on to others who may have claims against the HOA management firms.

Advertisements
Published in: on September 21, 2012 at 3:59 pm  Comments (4)  
Tags: , , , ,

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://pvtgov.wordpress.com/2012/09/21/az-class-action-against-hoa-management-firms-for-unauthorized-practice-of-law/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

4 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. George: What was the final Court Order regarding attorney Roger Wood’s lawsuit against HOA AAM/LLC in San tan Valley, AZ (2012)?

  2. Really Great to know about law firm and Thanks for sharing this Article

  3. A homeowner emailed, “23 of the 25 management companies in the Crame-Leatham vs. 360 Management, LLC et al., Rouge’s gallery of defendants are identifiable as members of Community Associations Institute (CAI) and many are also members of Arizona Association of Community Managers (AACM).”

  4. Great News About time someone takes them down, they should also include the law firms as welll, We will be signing up as a class member.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: