New facts in AZ HOA due process constitutionality decision

Please note that Judge McMurdie’s failure to provide an explanation of his denial of my Motion to Intervene (Intervenor motion denied in OAH fair trial constitutionality case), which is necessary in order for a Mover to determine the grounds for an appeal, is itself appealable as an abuse of discretion. However, the following letter had to be first delivered to the attention of Judge McMurdie:

 

If I had been permitted to intervene, these facts, discovered subsequent to filing the Motion to Intervene, would have been presented appropriately. Rule 60(c) states that  “This rule does not limit the power of a court to entertain an independent action to relieve a party from judgment, order . . . or to set aside a judgment for fraud upon the court.” 

 
Read the letter  . . . New facts in HOA constitutionality due process case
Advertisements
Published in: on February 24, 2009 at 12:27 pm  Comments (1)  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://pvtgov.wordpress.com/2009/02/24/new-facts-in-az-hoa-due-process-constitutionality-decision/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

One CommentLeave a comment

  1. Public condemnation is the best way to expose Judicial Abuses, and Judicial Misconduct, and the best way to call for another Greylord Operation, is to make Judge’s expose themselves for the fraud they are. This is how to do it, and please read all the way to the end for the ultimate revelation >>> http://wp.me/pLfGn-m <<<<


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s