Year 2 AZ OAH statistics on HOA cases — homeowners still win 43% of the cases!

As a result of the efforts of two homeowners, Bill Brown and Walt Kearns, Arizona HOA case statistics for the first two years (22 months) have been developed based on 59 cases, of which 42 were decided by the Administrative Law Judges ( 4 split decisions were ignored). In spite of some minor differences in views, the analysis showed some 43% of the cases were won by the petitioner, the homeowner. (18 decisions for the homeowner; 24 for the HOA).

This result is consistent with the results found in September 2007 by this writer based on the first-year cases (32 decisions), which showed a 42% win percentage by homeowners. (See

In Arizona in 2005, a bill to permit Justice of the Peace Courts to hear HOA disputes was defeated by claims by CAI attorney lobbyists of a huge flood of complaints that would destroy the effectiveness of the JP courts. This was a dramatic and marked reversal of the CAI position, maintained for years, that only 5% of the HOAs were bad, so why make new laws. It appears that CAI, Community Associations Institute, that national lobbying trade group proclaimed as the experts on homeowner associations matters, got it all wrong. What else are the CAI attorneys telling the legislators that’s has no basis in fact?

In 2006, the bill to authorize OAH resolution of HOA disputes had a tough battle — Chairmen of both the Senate and House Rules committees attempted to not hear the bill, based on their rights as Chairman of the Rules committee. They failed and the bill was overwhelmingly passed by the Arizona Senate and House.

Just this past week, Senator Obama stated the problem with the American political system quite succinctly. Referring to current political attitudes as “You’re on your own“, he said,

Ours is a promise that says government cannot solve all our problems, but what it should do is that which we cannot do for ourselves – protect us from harm . . . . Our government should work for us, not against us. It should help us, not hurt us.

There are more necessary reforms to the OAH procedures. The CAI attorneys have challenged the constitutional rights for OAH to adjudicate HOA disputes. They have attempted to turn OAH into a civil court with its strict Rules of Civil Procedure. The OAH cannot hear disputes raising questions of constitutional issues, but more importantly, it is restricted by the enabling act from applying the Restatement (Third) of Laws, Property: Servitudes to these disputes. Yet, HOAs owe their power and oppression based on this common law source. For example, Chapter 3 deals with the Validity of Covenants, and Chapter 6 deals with HOA structure, functions, etc.

When will the legislators, the courts, the media, and the various public interest nonprofits going to wake up and face the reality before them?

Published in: on September 1, 2008 at 7:00 pm  Comments (1)  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is:

RSS feed for comments on this post.

One CommentLeave a comment

  1. […] Law of the Land: HOA servitudes or the Constitution? In my Commentary this past September (Year 2 AZ OAH statistics on HOA cases — homeowners still win 43% of the cases!) I wrote,  “What else are the CAI attorneys telling the legislators that has no basis in […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s