I think it’s well past due for someone of courage to remove the blindfold from the Lady so she can see the real HOA world as it is.
Earlier I had reported on Arizona homeowner Bendt who dared speak out and criticize her HOA president and BOD using social media, emails, and pamphlets among other statements. See HOA limited-purpose public directors and officers and Limited purpose public HOA board; slander; AZ HB 2052. What courage and determination to fight against her HOA president and 2 board members who are attorneys.
With all respect and encouragement I have supported her fight to defend herself from accusations of defamation. In her appeal, which she lost, the HOA admitted that the president was a limited-purpose public figure with the acceptance that social media and that the HOA is a public forum; with protected free speech in regard to matters of members’ concern and HOA governance issues. Bendt protested an election and alleged improper and wrongful acts by the president. The result was a well calculated, in my view, personal defamation attack on Bendt to avoid the larger, broader aspects that protect members’ criticisms, with certain restraints.
Her defense has now moved on to the AZ Supreme Court, waiting for acceptance of her petition. Roughly less than 10% of supreme court petitions for review are accepted. Good luck to Bendt! If accepted, then her case is scheduled for oral arguments and a decision in a few months.
Stay tuned to this case of widespread importance to homeowner rights.
BTW, homeowner protections contained in AZ HB 2052 are lost as the bill died in Rules committee, which is controlled by the leaders of the majority party.
For the record, I am not a lawyer nor am I giving legal opinion or advice.
CONTINUING HOMEOWNER EDUCATION & REORIENTATION SERIES
Advocates and homeowners have failed to stand up to CAI because they, too, have been indoctrinated and have failed to acquire the knowledge and strategies to overcome their lack of credibility causing their lack of power.
“Blaming the wolf will not help the sheep much. The sheep must learn not to fall into the clutches of the wolf.” Gandhi.
Boards of directors need to be educated and reoriented on the principles of democracy, and on HOA constitutionality relating to violations of due process and the equal protection of the laws, because 1) the national lobbying entity, CAI, has indoctrinated boards of directors, the legislators, the courts, and the public with its CAI School of HOA Governance program that contains just lip service to constitutional questions, and 2) HOAs are a form of local government not subject to the Constitution.
This indoctrination, by teachings of The CAI School, of boards of directors and all HOA members prevents them from recognizing and accepting the true nature of HOA reality. Indoctrination “is the process of teaching a person or group to accept a set of beliefs uncritically.” Since the teachings are all that the indoctrinated ever see, they assume the School presents a true picture of HOA-Land. The actual reality! NOT SO!
The idea of the Continuing Homeowner Education & Reorientation Series is to find a way for the indoctrinated BODs and members to come into the “light” and attain enlightenment from the School’s conditioning practices. If they were to do this, they would be able to see HOA-Land for what it really is.
The title of this pamphlet, “Common Sense,” was chosen to identify and relate to the aims and purposes of the original 1776 pamphlet by Thomas Paine, Common Sense. Prior to the American Revolution it was Paine who provided the reasons and justifications for overthrowing the oppression government of King George III. He raised the consciousness of the colonists as to their second-class citizenship with respect to the British Empire, and something had to be done about. It was widely read by the Founding Fathers who did do something about it.
With a similar object in regard to oppressive, authoritarian HOA regimes, I present a summary of the essential issues that must be similarly remedied to bring about substantive changes to planned community/condo private governance.
Clarifications of meanings and concepts
A nation consists of a distinct population of people that are bound together by a common culture, history, and tradition who are typically concentrated within a specific geographic region. The common, binding element of HOAs is its organic law foundation, from which flow all state laws and the declarations of CC&Rs boilerplate, is based on The Homes Association Handbook of 1964.
An HOA is the governing body of a condominium or planned unit development (PUD) functioning for all intents and purposes as a de facto local political community government, but not recognized as such by state governments.
An organic law is a law, or system of laws, that form the foundation of a government, corporation or any other organization’s body of rules. A constitution is a particular form of organic law for a sovereign state. The US has indeed a set of documents constituting its organic law.
Definition of HOA-LAND: HOA-Land is a collection of fragmented independent principalities within America, known in general as “HOAs,” that are separate local private governments not subject to the constitution, and that collectively constitute a nation within the United States.
Read the book: HOA Common Sense: rejecting private government, a summary of 6 constitutional defects.
Understanding private elitist HOAs as social welfare HOAs
Data on HOA member demographics is scare but I’ve been able to uncover documents, 11 years apart, that lead one to believe that H-O-As are elitist for the most part. A CAI survey showed 79% respondents with incomes over $50,000 and 86% with some college of more. US Census showed 24.4% and 44.9% respectively. A confirming study on a large-scale H-O-A showed 88.1% with some college or more and 76.4% with income over $45,000.
According to CAI’s LSA (large-scale associations) category of 1,000 or more units, a Nevada CAI survey showed a mere 2.0% were LSAs. This emphasis by CAI on LSAs, a small minority of HOAs across the country, impacts all H-O-As of every size in the state as a result of its intense lobbying efforts, its one size fits all policy.
These surveys are not consistent with the totality of social welfare HOAs as contained in the IRS databases of 36,532 organizations filing under (c)4. Just 10.8% (3,931) of these organizations met the criteria for “homeowner associations” under the IRS subcategories, a far contrast with the surveys. Analyzing the justification by the IRS for one large-scale H-O-A raised concerns about the (c)4 tax-exempt process.
The absence of any discussion by SCG, a large-scale H-O-A, of it’s social welfare status and related activities is compelling. Based on my many years exposure to HOA legalities, I would hazard a guess that the board had advisers and assistance in preparing and filing its application. SCG has close ties to CAI by virtue of its directors being CAI members, its attorney and CAM being CAI members, and its accounting firm, Mansperger Patterson & McMullin, also being a CAI member.
Read the full research study at elitist H-O-As.