Comments on: Actions by AZ judge in HOA constitutionality case found ethical http://pvtgov.wordpress.com/2009/05/06/actions-by-az-judge-in-constitutionality-case-found-ethical/ Supporting Principles of Democratic Government for HOAs Wed, 09 Dec 2009 01:50:36 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Betsy Ross http://pvtgov.wordpress.com/2009/05/06/actions-by-az-judge-in-constitutionality-case-found-ethical/#comment-327 Betsy Ross Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:59:25 +0000 http://pvtgov.wordpress.com/?p=689#comment-327 HOAs are illegal on their face and although your Latin is impressive, if not wholey off the mark. The state had no authority to "communize" home ownership, nor to transfer governmental powers to citizens in their collusion with developers. Period. And the Arizona courts will continue to violate their Constitutional oaths of office because they are on the HOA gravy train - since there also are no tax credits recognized for these excess property taxes. And the proof is all around them, that "communism" in land and home ownership were hardly what the founders had in mind for "property ownership" in this country. HOAs are illegal on their face and although your Latin is impressive, if not wholey off the mark. The state had no authority to “communize” home ownership, nor to transfer governmental powers to citizens in their collusion with developers. Period.

And the Arizona courts will continue to violate their Constitutional oaths of office because they are on the HOA gravy train – since there also are no tax credits recognized for these excess property taxes.

And the proof is all around them, that “communism” in land and home ownership were hardly what the founders had in mind for “property ownership” in this country.

]]> By: HOAs, justice, and judicial myth and precedent « HOA Constitutional Government http://pvtgov.wordpress.com/2009/05/06/actions-by-az-judge-in-constitutionality-case-found-ethical/#comment-319 HOAs, justice, and judicial myth and precedent « HOA Constitutional Government Tue, 26 May 2009 15:48:22 +0000 http://pvtgov.wordpress.com/?p=689#comment-319 [...]  As an example with respect to HOAs regarding a default decision on the constitutionality of an a two year-old Arizona HOA statute,  And I concluded with the appeal, “For the Court to do justice and maintain its integrity, my ‘letter of fact’ and supporting materials must be made part of the case.”   All that I asked, the real issue, was to remove a “gag order” on my materials containing factual information that could have no other result than to have the judge, sua sponte,  as permitted under the law, put the factual materials on record in order for justice to be done.  (See Actions by AZ judge in HOA constitutionality case found ethical). [...] [...]  As an example with respect to HOAs regarding a default decision on the constitutionality of an a two year-old Arizona HOA statute,  And I concluded with the appeal, “For the Court to do justice and maintain its integrity, my ‘letter of fact’ and supporting materials must be made part of the case.”   All that I asked, the real issue, was to remove a “gag order” on my materials containing factual information that could have no other result than to have the judge, sua sponte,  as permitted under the law, put the factual materials on record in order for justice to be done.  (See Actions by AZ judge in HOA constitutionality case found ethical). [...]

]]> By: pvtgov http://pvtgov.wordpress.com/2009/05/06/actions-by-az-judge-in-constitutionality-case-found-ethical/#comment-311 pvtgov Thu, 07 May 2009 15:24:13 +0000 http://pvtgov.wordpress.com/?p=689#comment-311 Please compare this judicial secretiveness with the events at the AZ Senate last June 27th where the Republicans were charged with ethics violations by creating new rules "on-the-spot." (See the video at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJCJ-6v-5sk). While the following ethics complaint was dismissed,the Legislature made the ethics complaint public. The chairmain who permitted the violation to stand had to answer in public and explain himself. Please compare this judicial secretiveness with the events at the AZ Senate last June 27th where the Republicans were charged with ethics violations by creating new rules “on-the-spot.” (See the video at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJCJ-6v-5sk). While the following ethics complaint was dismissed,the Legislature made the ethics complaint public. The chairmain who permitted the violation to stand had to answer in public and explain himself.

]]>